Od of Whole Food Market Essay

cosmos presidential termal behavior and structure atomic number 18 find parts in leading a confederation to be efficient and successful. Organizational diagnosis moulds have been gived to entirelyow companies to scrutinize themselves to be sure that they atomic number 18 utilizing these key occurrenceors correctly. When a firm conducts an organisational diagnosis it is performed to disclose specialisms and weaknesses in its systems thus ontogenesis measures to improve the organisations performance. Knowing which warning to hire is critical beca routine misusing patterns could lead to inaccurate findings. In the following pages I leave behind hold forth and compargon many another(prenominal) nonpluss to include the 7S poser, the congruence type, and the Burke-Litwin pretence. After discussing a few publishings that unscathed Foods commercialize (WFM) is face I go forth recommend which posture is outdo worthy for them and explain why. Force Field psychoanalysisThis model commits an organizational diagnosis to identify driving forces busheling a smart set (F wholeetta, 2005). Force Field analysis encap suitables a company to identify what causes replace and what hinders win over within a certain organization. This will allow an organization to develop measures that will allow the organizations driving forces to be maximized turn the restraining forces ar at the same quantify limited to allow the organization to be more efficient. The drawback to this model is that it is extremely dewy-eyed and is non the best model for define specific problems it more or slight will allow a company to reach a desired severalize of affairs and nonhing else. Leavitts formThis model has proletariat variables, technological variables, structure variables and human variables. The model drive out be utilise to estimate how to change in sensation of the variables will expunge the separates, and is best employ in analysis con cerning organizational structure and human resources. The force play in this model lays in its simplicity notwithstanding this throne also be viewed as a weakness because the output from the model open firenot provide direct causal statements relating to the variables. Likert schema AnalysisThis analysis is best use in an organization to examine issues relating to motivation, communication, moveion, destruction setting, decision making, control and performance. The Likert System is of the essence(predicate) in analyzing management systems within an organization and how they affect performance (Falletta, 2005). This model evaluates employee perceptions and how they affect individual and group performance. The main strength of this model is that is uses determined scales which make sagacity more qualitative and easier. The drawback of this model is that it is in reality only trusty for examining the social face affecting an organization and doesnt go out what affects that processes, structure and the milieu have on an organization. McKinsey 7S Frame move aroundVariables that are examined in this model include style, staff, systems, skills, system, structure, and shared values. This model is applied in an organization to investigate whether or not their inputs much(prenominal) as structure, skills, and strategy align with company objectives (Falletta, 2005). A change in any of the variables will tied(p)tually cause changes in the different variables. The model has strength in the form of world able to analyze essential variables that affect an organizations performance and it is simpler to use than some of the other models. However, the model does not take into consideration environmental effects on a companys effectiveness and operations. Burke-Litwin putThis model includes the following variables management practices work unit climate, mission and strategy, organizational structure, leadership, caper requirements and individual skil ls, individual needs and values, purification, systems, motivation, and last-placely individual and organizational performance. The Burke-Litwin copy bottom be used to investigate not only internal only when outer featureors that warp an organization and further goes to aiming how the factors interact (Martins & Coetzee, 2009). nearly recall this to be one of the some deep and overall better OD models to use for analysis because it provides the nature and direction of influence of organizational variables. This model also provides a difference among transformational and transactional dynamics. The strength of this model is that it is able to analyze organizational structure, task requirements, individual skills, and the outer environment all at the same time. Congruence ModelThis model contains inputs, throughputs, and outputs and is best used in an organization to identify the degree to which the needs, objectives and structures of one part of an organization ar e congruent to the needs, objectives and structure of another part (Falletta, 2005). Its strength is in the obvious ability it has to show organizations how to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The models main weakness is that it does not evaluate effect of demands made by the environment (Nadler & Tushman, 1980). Current Issues WFM is Facing perchance the largest issue that WFM faces is the price of their corkings. The fact of the social function is not everyone who wants inborn and organic foods depose enjoy the WFM experience. There is no confusion in the fact that organic and internal food is more expensive than other groceries and in times of economic note district if customers dont feel they are acquire a good upsurge then they will most presumable seek cheaper alternatives. What this means is when someones budget shrinks they wont be able to purchase as more at WFM vs. one of their competitors. other issue that is just as chief(prenominal) to WFM is bran- modern entrants to the organic and natural foods market with companies deal Wal Mart, Kroger and other larger, cheaper supermarkets. These too large name companies are starting to create their have got buck private label brands to fight with WFM besides since a majority of their business is derived from products that arent natural and organic they can cut prices in this segment of the market to attract customers to their terminal while not taking a huge loss in profits.The final issue facing WFM is the threat of switch over products and services. maven major competitor of WFM is monger Joes Co. who also offers upscale groceries such(prenominal) as health foods and organic produce. One strength of WFM over Wal Mart and Kroger are their unique store atmospheres that most heavy(p) box stores lack but companies same Trader Joes threaten WFM with their own Mom and Pop substitute atmosphere. some other company deal this was Wild Oats which WFM was able to acquire to lessen so me of their competition. What Model is Best for WFM?Given the set of organizational diagnosis models from Falletta, I remember the most useful one for analyzing Whole Foods Market will be the Burke-Litwin Model. According to Falletta, and more others in the realm of OD offer that this model provides a strong admittance for analyzing relationships among leadership an d strategy, financial decisions and useable issues. All three of the issues that WFM is facing I cerebrate could benefit from some changes via this OD model. The fact that this model investigates internal and international factors influencing an organization and further upholds show how factors interact sets this model ahead of many of the earlier OD models that exist and some even discussed above.For example an external factor equivalent how the economy is doing largely affects WFM because customers know in that location are cheaper alternatives and early OD models like the Force Field Model would not be able to use this factor to help better situate the company. The Burke-Litwin Model however will take the external environment into consideration during its diagnosis. In fact all three issues listed above that WFM is facing can be categorized as dealing mostly with external environment issues. Something that only an open systems model could handle.Another reason I deal that The B-L Model should be used by WFM is the fact that it can distinguish between the culture and climate of an organization and also between transformational and transactional dynamics (Falletta, 2005). Obviously in the big picture this fact is primary(prenominal) because to the highest degree no other model does this. This is important for WFM because their brand, image, store atmosphere are crucial in keeping their customers and getting new customers so not being able to diagnose these areas correctly could be traumatic for them. I think transformational and transactional leadership principles can largely affect a n organization . specifically I think that if a good transformational leadership principle is enacted throughout an organization it is visible to the outside through things such as employees motivation and personality towards customers. This is important for WFM because of the type of atmosphere they are seek to create inside their stores. Using this model could help diagnose this variable and defy another reason to customers to shop at WFM and not at one of its competitors who is offer a substitute product.I believe the same principle applies to the variables of climate and culture. Most of the other models combine these devil variables but as we know now these two variables need to be set by and the B-L model is the model that allows for that. As already mentioned above the companies climate and culture are two things that can be controlled and if used effectively cannot only help the business for obvious reasons but I believe these are two variables that would especially help WFM because these are variables that outsiders can pick up on when things are going good or even wrong. Take apple for example, the climate and culture of this company create a mysterious phenomenon that brings its customers closer to the company. You cant say this for Microsoft or Samsung. This is something that WFM could use more of to again out compete with Trader Joes. ConclusionIn closing, since the 50s there have been numerous OD models created and each one make upon the last. Organizations today now have many options when it comes to OD and which model to use but knowing which model to use is just as important as getting an accurate OD. By comparing all the models and identifying the issues an organization currently has one can better diagnose the situation. For WFM I believe the Burke-Litwin Model would best suit them and sack the issues described above.