Common Themes in Orwell, Lessing, Nehru and Chamberlain’s Texts Essay

The texts by Orwell, Lessing, Nehru and Chamberlain each present assort com musical compositionds just about colonialism, arguments that atomic number 18 dealive(p)red powerfully by the mixed techniques employed by each author. interpreted collectively, the texts show that colonialism causes destitution and backwardness in the colonised country or countries, and that it brings about various pressures on the colonizer. In all these texts, the era of colonialism is portrayed as a period wherein it is the colonizer that is the subject, acting on the annex an object that resists understanding and has a mind of its give. Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell. The argument put forward in this short story is clear.In the reference of the story, he already knows that imperialism was an evil thing. In the course of the story, however, this realization becomes much precise When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys For it is the condition of his rule t hat he shall spend his life in toilsome to impress the natives, and so in every crisis he has got to do what the natives yield of him. This argument is delivered sooner consistently, culminating in Orwells act of actually injection the elephant. The argument is delivered powerfully because the story is about an actual situation in which the argument is demonstrated in the concrete.No Witchcraft for Sale by Doris Lessing. The argument do by Lessing in this story is overly clear. In the first parts, this argument was made No one can live in Africa ithout learning very soon that there is an ancient recognition of leaf and soil and season and, too, perhaps the most important of all, of the darker tracts of the world mind which is the black mans heritage. In a deliver the goods paragraph, this argument was made While all of them knew t hat in the render of Africa are waiting valuable drugs locked in bark, in simple-looking leaves, in roots, it was eternally impossible to eve r get the legality about them from the natives themselves.The argument is made consistently. While Gideon did give some plant to the scientist, it is revealed in the end that the truth about the healing leaves was not communicated. The argument is delivered powerfully because we are shown a clear example of healing, and then we are shown a story of a Western scientist who failed to understand this healing. The Noble Mansion of Free India by Jawaharlal Nehru. The argument made in this speech is clear, consistently asserted throughout the speech.Nehru draws a portrait of a country that has suffered for such a long time, a country that has succeeded and got an opportunity to move out of that suffering, and a country that is enthusiastic to succeed in moving out of that suffering. He declares We rejoice in that freedom, even though clouds surround us, and many of our people are sorrow-stricken and challenging problems encompass us. But freedom brings responsibilities and burdens and we have to face them in the inspirit of a free and disciplined people. The argument is delivered powerfully because the speech is quite consistent on the points it directs. I Believe in a British pudding stone by Joseph Chamberlain.The argument made in this speech is also clear, supported by minor arguments made by the author. Chamberlain argues his case by eliminating other options, choosing what best suits the interest of a British Empire he believes in I believe in a British Empire, in an Empire which, though it should be its first duty to cultivate intimacy with all the nations of the world, should yet, even if alone, be self-sustaining and self-sufficient, able to maintain itself against the contention of all its rivals.And I do not believe in in a Little England which shall be separated from all those to whom it would in the inhering course look for support and affection, a little England which would then be dependent absolutely on the mercy of those who envy its present successfulness The argument is delivered powerfully because the speech consistently argued from the interest of the British Empire at that time. Common Theme or Sentiment About Colonialism. The whole shebang show a common theme or sentiment about colonialism.One gets the sense, specially from Orwell and Chamberlain, that colonialism imposes certain demands on the colonizers Orwell spells out that from the colonized, Chamberlain, that from the competitors as well. It is clear from all the works that the colonizer always thinks in terms of its own interests, while the colonized is either something foreign that resists understanding, or is eager to reach its own independence from the colonizer. Colonialism is shown to be a period wherein it is the colonizer that acts and it is the colonized that is the receiver of that action.In all the works, we are exposed to the backwardness and poverty in which the colonized live. We are given the impression that colonialism dehumanizes both t he colonized and the colonizer. These dynamics of colonialism, especially as it relates to literature, is clearly discussed in Edward W. Saids important work, Orientalism. Commentary. I think that the themes or sentiments shared by the authors, exclude Chamberlain perhaps, point to arguments that are on the whole true about colonialism. in that respect are particular features of each text that are worth play up I think that Orwell, while critical of colonialism, reinforces the notion of White mans burden that the colonizer has a very important burster for the improvement of the colonized. Lessing shows how the colonizer, acting from an understanding different from that of the colonized, becomes a disrespectful, predatory bearing in the life of the colonized. Nehru is too nice towards the colonize in his speech, enumerating the genial effects of colonialism yet refusing to blame these on the colonizer.Chamberlain acts out from the particular interests and stead of the colonizer . In making this paper, I realized how important it is to view things from the perspectives of various texts more significantly, how important it is to have a general understanding (of colonialism, in this case) that locates the particular perspectives. From such a general understanding, one can make sense of the various perspectives, as well as get a general idea of how colonialism was actually experienced by those who lived through it. I appreciated the guide question, having brought out the common theme and sentiment in these texts.